ASSESSMENT OF THE RESISTANCE OF THE BREEDING MATERIAL OF TABLE BEET TO STORAGE DISEASES

С.А. Ветрова, Е.Г. Козарь, И.А. Енгалычева, К.С. Мухина

Abstract


Because of the deterioration of the phytopathological situation, it is expedient to increase the resistance of varieties and hybrids to plant disease agents. In the Moscow Region, beet crop losses during long-term storage can reach 25-60% or more. Therefore, the use of existing and the development of new storage-disease resistant varieties and hybrids becomes increasingly important. The aim of the present study was to evaluate table beet lines and to identify sources of stable resistance to clamp rot and associated valuable traits. The work included 244 sterile ms-A lines and 187 fertile mf-B lines (sterility fixers) of table beet developed at the Laboratory of Breeding and Seed Production of Table Root Crops. The beet plants were grown in a film greenhouse at the Experimental Production Unit of the Federal Scientific Vegetable Breeding Center (Odintsovo District, Moscow Region) in 2017-2021 and stored in containers at 1...2 °C temperature and 90-92% humidity for seven months. Phytosanitary monitoring of the prevalence of diseases during storage and identification of isolated pathogens were carried out using the facilities of Laboratory of Plant Immunity and Protection according to generally accepted methods. It was shown that, under the current conditions in Moscow Region, the basis of the pathogenic complex of mycotic diseases of table beet root crops is formed by pathogens from the genera Fusarium, Phoma and Alternaria, fungi from the genera Botrytis, Sclerotinia, and Penicillium becoming less common. In most cases, several types of pathogens are simultaneously present on affected beet roots. The characteristics of the distribution of samples by their resistance to storage conditions at different stages of breeding process were determined in the groups of fertile mf-B lines and of the sterile ms-A lines that were obtained using the former ones. The lines were identified that were promising from the point of view of stable long-term resistance to storage diseases and of other economically valuable and thus should be used in breeding for creating new three-line hybrids of table beet.

Keywords


beetroot, resistance, linear material, root crop, storage, cahate rot, selection.


Как процитировать материал

References


1. Буренин ВИ. К проблеме церкоспороустойчивости сахарной свеклы (задачи селекции и исходный материал). Сахарная свекла. 2018;(10):2-5.

2. Козарь ЕГ, Ветрова СА, Енгалычева ИА, Федорова МИ. Оценка устойчивости селекционного материала свеклы столовой к церкоспорозу на фоне эпифитотии в условиях защищенного грунта московской области. Овощи России. 2019;(6):121-9.

3. Степанов ВА, Федорова МИ, Ветрова СА, Заячковский ВА, Заячковская ТВ, Вюртц ТС. Новый сортимент для селекции овощных корнеплодов и технологии его поддержания. Овощи России. 2018;2(40):28-31.

4. Левитин ММ. Современные видовые названия фитопатогенных грибов. Защита и карантин растений. 2018;(8):8-11.

5. Левитин ММ, Новожилов КВ, Афанасенко ОС, Михайлова ЛА, Мироненко НВ, Гагкаева ТЮ, Ганнибал ФБ. Миграции фитопатогенных грибов и ареалы популяций. В кн.: Микология сегодня. Москва; 2011. С. 261-74.

6. Волгин ВВ. Теория и практика создания гетерозисных гибридов сахарной свеклы на основе ЦМС. Автореф. дис. д-ра с.-х. наук. Краснодар; 2007.

7. Свиридов АВ. Защита корнеплодов сахарной свеклы от кагатной гнили. Защита и карантин растений. 2014;(5):25-30.

8. Стогниенко ОИ, Мелькумова ЕА, Корниенко АВ. Церкоспороз сахарной свеклы и методы снижения его вредоносности. Воронеж, 2016.

9. Балков ИЯ. Возникновение стерильных по пыльце форм сахарной свеклы в процессе инцухтирования. Вестник с.-х. науки. 1976;(12):20-6.

10. Грибанова НП. Создание, оценка линий О-типа и их МС-аналогов в селекции сахарной свеклы на гетерозис. Автореф. дис канд. с.-х. наук. Рамонь: Всероссийский НИИ сахарной свеклы и сахара им. А.Л. Мазлумова; 1995.

11. Билай ВИ, Элланская ИА. Основные микологические методы в фитопатологии. В кн.: Методы экспериментальной микологии. Киев; 1982. С.418-30.

12. Паушева ЗП. Практикум по цитологии растений. Москва; 1989.

13. Ганнибал ФБ, Орина АС, Левитин ММ. Альтернариозы сельскохозяйственных культур на территории России. Защита и карантин растений. 2010;(5):30-2.

14. Рекомендации по учету и выявлению вредителей и болезней сельскохозяйственных растений. Воронеж; 1984.

15. Gannibal PhB., Levitin MM. Monitoring of Alternarioses of Crops and Identification of Fungi of the Genus Alternaria. St.-Petersburg; 2011.

16. Johnson DA, Simmons EG, Miller JS, Stewart EL. Taxonomy and pathology of Macrospora/Nimbya on some North American bulrushes (Scirpus spp.). Mycotaxon. 2002;(84):413-28.

17. Доспехов БА. Методика полевого опыта. Москва; 1985.

18. Селиванова ГА, Смирнов МА. Видовой состав возбудителей кагатной гнили маточной сахарной свеклы при хранении. Сахар. 2019;(8):22-5.

19. Tesoriere L, Allegra M, Butera D, Livrea MA. Absorption, excretion, and distribution of dietary antioxidant beta-lainsin LDLs: potential health effects of beta-lains in humans. Am J Clin Nutrit. 2004;80(4):941-5. References

1. Burenin VI. The problem of Cercospora tolerance of sugar beet (breeding objectives and source material). Sapharnaya Sviokla. 2018;(10):2-5. (In Russ.)

2. Kozar YeG, Vetrova SA., Yengalycheva IA, Fedorova MI. Evaluation of the resistance of the breeding beetroot material to Cercospora upon epiphytotic in greenhouses of the Moscow region. Ovoschi Rossii. 2019;(6):121-9.

3. Stepanov VA, Fedorova MI, Vetrova SA, Zayachkovsky VA, Zayachkovskaya TV, Wurtz TS. A new assortment for the selection of root vegetables and a technology for its maintenance. Ovoschi Rossii. 2018;2(40):28-31. (In Russ.)

4. Levitin MM. Modern species names of phytopathogenic fungi. Zaschita i Karantin Rasteniy. 2018;(8):8-11. (In Russ)

5. Levitin MM, Novozhilov KV, Afanasenko OS, Mikhaylova LA, Mironenko NV, Gagkayva T.Yu, Gannibal FB. Migration of phytopathogenic fungi and areas of their populations. In: Mikologiya Segodnia Mycology Today. Moscow; 2011. P. 261-74. (In Russ)

6. Volgin VV. Theory and Practice of Creation of Heterosis Hybrids of Sugar Beet based on CMS. PhD Theses. Krasnodar; 2007. (In Russ.)

7. Sviridov AV. Protection of sugar beet root crops from clamp rot. Zaschita i Karantin Rasteniy. 2014;(5):25-30. (In Russ)

8. Stognienko OI, Melkumova YeA, Korniyenko AV. Tserkosporoz Sakharnoy Sviokly i Metody Snizheniya Yego Vredonosnosti Cercosporosis of Sugar Beet and Methods of Reducing its Harmfulness. Voronezh; 2016. (In Russ.)

9. Balkov IYa. The emergence of pollen-sterile forms of sugar beet in the process of inbreeding. Vestnik Selskokhoziaystvennoy Nauki. 1976;(12): 20-6. (In Russ.)

10. Gribanova NP. Creation and Evaluation of O-type Lines and Their MS Analogues in Selection of Sugar Beet for Heterosis. PhD Theses. Ramon’; A.L. Mazlumov All-Russian Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar; 1995. (In Russ.)

11. Bilay VI, Ellanskaya IA. Basic mycological methods in phytopathology. In: Metody Eksperimentalnoy Mikologii Methods of Experimental Mycology. Kiev; 1982. P. 418-30. (In Russ.)

12. Pausheva ZP. Praktikum po Tsitologii Rasteniy Plant Cytology Practicum. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola. 1989. (In Russ.)

13. Gannibal FB, Orina AS., Levitin MM. Alternarioses of agricultural crops in Russia. Zaschita i Karantin Rasteniy 2010;(5):30-2. (In Russ)

14. Anonimous. Recommendations on Registering and Identification of Pests and Diseases of Agricultural Plants. Voronezh; 1984. (In Russ.)

15. Gannibal PhB, Levitin MM. Monitoring of Alternarioses of Crops and Identification of Fungi of the Genus Alternaria. St.-Petersburg; 2011.

16. Johnson DA, Simmons EG, Miller JS, Stewart EL. Taxonomy and pathology of Macrospora/Nimbya on some North American bulrushes (Scirpus spp.). Mycotaxon. 2002;(84):413-28.

17. Dospekhov BA. Metodika Polevgo Opyta Technique of Field Experiments. Moscow; 1985. (In Russ.)

18. Selivanova GA, Smirnov MA. Species composition of the causative agents of calcareous rot of stock sugar beet during storage. Sakhar. 2019;(8):22-5. (In Russ)

19. Tesoriere L, Allegra M, Butera D, Livrea MA. Absorption, excretion, and distribution of dietary antioxidant beta-lainsin LDLs: potential health effects of beta-lains in humans. Am J Clin Nutrit. 2004;80(4):941-5.




© ФОНД НАУЧНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ "XXI ВЕК"