IMMUNOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF GRAPE SPECIES AND VARIETIES FOR MYCOSES IN THE VORONEZH REGION

О.О. Белошапкина, А.Д. Калашников, Д.В. Калашников, Е.Н. Кислин

Abstract


The study was carried out in 2020-2021 in the south of the Voronezh Region (Pavlovsk), which is the northern zone of uncovered viticulture, in a private collection of grapes laid in 2015 for immunological field assessment of grape species and varieties during visual field surveys of plants. It was ащгтв that powdery mildew, oidium and anthracnose were the dominant fungal diseases. All 7 tested varieties of different origin were affected by mildew, more strongly in a rainy 2021 than in 2020. High resistance to powdery mildew was noticed in the varieties Liberty, Prime Seedless and Marshal Foch (development rate within 12%). Berry lesions were not noted. Vitis vulpina was not affected by powdery mildew in both years of research. V. amurensis and V. labrusca showed high resistance, disease prevalence being within 9%, and disease development, wihtin 1%. All tested varieties were affected by oidium more strongly in 2020 than in 2021. In the varieties Nadezhda AZOS and Surkhak, disease development was on average about 25%, which was significantly less than in other varieties (32-45%). Berry lesions were not noticed. The species V. аmurensis, V. labrusca and V. vulpina were not affected by oidium in both years of the study. The greatest resistance to the stem form of anthracnose was found in the varieties Liberty, Marshal Foch and Prime Seedless. The species V. аmurensis, V. labrusca and V. vulpina were affected by anthracnose to a minimal extent in both years, disease prevalence being within 30% and development ranging from 0.5 to 5%. The indicated grape varieties and species that are relatively resistant to fungal diseases may be used as a starting material for selection for resistance to mycoses.

Keywords


grape, fungal pests, monitoring of species and varieties resistance

References


1. Агапова СИ, Толокова РП, Бурдинская ВФ. Болезни и вредители на виноградниках Ростовской области в 1984-2000 годах. Виноград и вино России. 2001;(3):28-9.

2. Алейникова НВ, Галкина ЕС, Радионовская ЯЭ. Болезни и вредители виноградной лозы. Ялта; 2018.

3. Арестова НО, Рябчун ИО. Развитие фитопатогенов виноградных растений в условиях Ростовской области. Плодоводство и виноградарство Юга России. 2016;42(06).

4. Галкина ЕС, Алейникова НВ. Особенности развития резистентности возбудителя оидиума винограда (Uncinula necator Burr) к стробилуринам в условиях Южного берега Крыма. Современная микология в России. 2015;5:33-5.

5. Методическое и аналитическое обеспечение исследований по садоводству. Краснодар: ГНУ СКЗНИИСиВ; 2010.

6. Петров ВС. Формирование адаптивного сортимента винограда в нестабильных условиях среды. Плодоводство и виноградарство Юга России. 2013;20(2):15-30.

7. Талаш АИ. Защита растений винограда от болезней и вредителей. Краснодар: ФГБНУ СКЗНИИСиВ; 2015.

8. Трошин ЛП. Ампелография и селекция винограда. Краснодар: Изд. «Вольные мастера»; 1999.

9. Якушина НА, Галкина ЕС, Шапоренко ВН, Саколина ЕА. Оптимизация применения фунгицидов в виноградном агроценозе Южного берега Крыма. Виноградарство и виноделие: сборник научных трудов НИВиВ «Магарач». 2011;41(1):38-41.

10. Якушина НА, Болотянская ЕА. Обоснование усиления вредоносности оидиума на виноградниках Южного берега Крыма в современных условиях. Виноградарство и виноделие: сборник научных трудов НИВиВ «Магарач». 2012;(2):6-8.

1. Agapova SI, Tikikova RP, Burdinskaya VF. Diseases and pests in vineyards of Rostov Region in 1984-2000. Vinograd i Vino v Rossii. 2001;(3):28-9.

2. Aleynikova NV, Galkina YeS, Radionovskaya YaE. Bolezni i Vrediteli Vonogradnoy Lozy. Yalta; 2018.

3. Arestova NO, Riabchun IO. Vine phytopathogens development in Rostov Region conditions. Plodovodstvo i Vinogradorstvo Yuga Rossii. 2016;42(06).

4. Galkina YeS, Aleynikova NV. Specific features of the development of resistance of vine oidium agent Uncinula necator Burr to strobilurins under the condition of the southern coast of Crimea. Sovremennaya Mikologiya v Rossii. 2015;5:33-5.

5. Anonymous. Metodicheskoye i Analiticheskoye Obespecheniye Issledovaniy po Sadovodstvu. Krasnodar: GNU SKZYNIISiV; 2010.

6. Petrov VS. The development of an adaptive assortment of vine under unstable environmental conditions. Plodovodstvo i Vinogradorstvo Yuga Rossii. 2013;20(2):15-30.

7. Takash FI. Zaschita Rasteniy Vinograda ot Bolzney i Vrediteley Krasnodar: FGBNU SKZYNIISiV; 2015.

8. Troshin LP. Ampelografiya i Selektsiya Vinograda. Krasnodar: Volnye Mastera; 1999.

9. Yakushina NA, Galkina YeS, Shaporenko VN, Sakolina YeA. Optimization of fungicide use in the vine agrocenoses of the southern coast od Crimea. Vinogradsarstvo i Vinodeliye. 2011;41(1):38-41

10. Yakushina NA, Blotianskaya YeA. A rational for considering the hazard by oidium to vineyards as currently increasing at the southern coast of Crimea. Vinogradsarstvo i Vinodeliye. 2012;(2):6-8.

11. Batukaev AA, Palaeva DО, Batukaev MS, Sobralieva EА. In vitro reproduction and ex vitro adaptation of complex resistant grape varieties. Adv Engineering Res. 2018: 895-9.

12. Calonnec A et al. Effects of Uncinula necator on the yield and quality of grapes (Vitis vinifera) and wine. Plant Pathol. 2004;53(4):434-45.

13. Jermini M, Blaise P, Gessler C, Jermini M. Quantitative effect of leaf damage caused by downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) on growth and yield quality of grapevine «Merlot» (Vitis vinifera). Vitis. 2010;49(2):77-85.

14. Yurchenko EG, Savchuk NV, Porotikova EV, Vinogradova SV. First report of grapevine (Vitis sp.) cluster blight caused by Fusarium proliferatum in Russia. Plant Disease. 2020;104(3):991.




© ФОНД НАУЧНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ "XXI ВЕК"